Max Motion MQP-62 | T-Frame Motor 50HP, 1800RPM, 208-230/460V, Frame 326T, TEFC, Cast Iron

Max Motion MQP-62 | T-Frame Motor 50HP, 1800RPM, 208-230/460V, Frame 326T, TEFC, Cast Iron

Marsoni

M251S

$3051.27

Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping. Friday, May 29

Max Motion MQP-62 | T-Frame Motor 50HP, 1800RPM, 208-230/460V, Frame 326T, TEFC, Cast IronProduct Details : Max Motion MQP 62 T Frame Motor 50HP, 1800RPM, 208 230 460V, Frame 326T, TEFC, Cast Iron Part No: MQP 62 Product Type: T Frame TEFC Brand: Max Motion Frame: 326T Horsepower (HP): 50 RPM: 4 ples 1400 to 1800 Voltage: 208 230 460 (3 PH) F. L. Amps: 124 116. 2 58. 1 Phase: 3 Enclosure: TEFC Base: Rigid Material(s): Cast Iron Details: MG 1 Design B and MG 1 Part 31 Meets or exceeds NEMA Premium Efficiencies Factory Certified Division 2

Easy Shipping

Quick Dispatch:

Your Max Motion MQP-62 | T-Frame Motor 50HP, 1800RPM, 208-230/460V, Frame 326T, TEFC, Cast Iron orders ship within 1-2 business days.

Delivery Options:

Standard: 3-7 business days
Fast: 2-3 business days
Express: 1-2 business days

Order Tracking:

You'll receive a tracking link by email once your Max Motion MQP-62 | T-Frame Motor 50HP, 1800RPM, 208-230/460V, Frame 326T, TEFC, Cast Iron ships.

Need Help?
Questions about Max Motion MQP-62 | T-Frame Motor 50HP, 1800RPM, 208-230/460V, Frame 326T, TEFC, Cast Iron, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.

Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for Max Motion MQP-62 | T-Frame Motor 50HP, 1800RPM, 208-230/460V, Frame 326T, TEFC, Cast Iron in your area.

Get Shipping Estimates

Country Zip/Postal Code

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

Unfortunately I ordered mine before the last review that said these are slip-ins. I'm not understanding that sock thing. It makes it harder to put the shoe on (So opposite of a slip-in) And it pulls your sock down (pictures show them wearing one) constantly when you're walking. And apparently the shoelaces are just for looks? But they're so long you have to tie them anyway, and as someone said the laces are bad. Skinny wax. I'm going to give this three stars though because they are very comfortable. So at this point in time I don't know if I'm going to return them (I got brown) as there aren't too many sneaker dress shoes (arch support) there's dress shoes that are more comfortable (but not sneaker comfortable).

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on February 11, 2026

Verified Purchase

Amy Carreon

Omaha, US

★★★★★ 5

Love the color!

Size: 9.5, Color: Dark Tan

Boyfriend loved them, nice and rich in color. He thought they were comfy and the style was accurate.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on May 31, 2026

Verified Purchase

mike espelund

Battle Creek, US

★★★★★ 5

fits well

Size: 9.5, Color: Black

great shoes suprisingly well made

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on May 13, 2026

Verified Purchase

Amazon Customer

New York, US

★★★★★ 5

Good design

Size: 10.5, Color: Cognac, Size: 10.5, Color: Cognac

Nice design and perfect craftsmanship. For the shoe material, the quality is ok.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on April 11, 2026

Verified Purchase

Marina Eshak

Natrona Heights, US

★★★★★ 3

Light but average

Size: 10.5, Color: Black

Three stars. These are very lightweight and seem fine for the price, but the leather felt a bit too thin for what I was looking for. I didn’t even end up trying them on because they just didn’t feel like they would hold up long term. They’re not bad if you need something inexpensive for occasional wear, but I wanted something that would last. It felt like they might scratch easily, so I decided to return these and go with a more expensive option instead.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on February 2, 2026