Polypropylene Rope with Eye, Ø10 MM, Length: 27m (88ft) - Sparex Part S.55994

Polypropylene Rope with Eye, Ø10 MM, Length: 27m (88ft) - Sparex Part S.55994

Marsoni

M251S

$20.88

Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping. Friday, May 29

Polypropylene Rope with Eye, Ø10 MM, Length: 27m (88ft) - Sparex Part S.55994Polypropylene Rope with Eye, 10mm, Length: 27m (88ft) S. 55994 Introducing the Polypropylene Rope with Eye, a reliable and durable solution for all your lifting and securing needs. With a Safe Working Load of 305 kgs and an impressive Breaking Load of 1425 kg, this rope is designed to handle heavy duty tasks with ease. Product Features Brand: Sparex Length: 27 meters (88 feet) Diameter: 10 mm (3 8 inches) Tariff Code: 5607410000 Alternative to: 55995

Easy Shipping

Quick Dispatch:

Your Polypropylene Rope with Eye, Ø10 MM, Length: 27m (88ft) - Sparex Part S.55994 orders ship within 1-2 business days.

Delivery Options:

Standard: 3-7 business days
Fast: 2-3 business days
Express: 1-2 business days

Order Tracking:

You'll receive a tracking link by email once your Polypropylene Rope with Eye, Ø10 MM, Length: 27m (88ft) - Sparex Part S.55994 ships.

Need Help?
Questions about Polypropylene Rope with Eye, Ø10 MM, Length: 27m (88ft) - Sparex Part S.55994, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.

Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for Polypropylene Rope with Eye, Ø10 MM, Length: 27m (88ft) - Sparex Part S.55994 in your area.

Get Shipping Estimates

Country Zip/Postal Code

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

Best no show socks ever made!!!!! I've been struggling for 2 years to find ones that actually stay on your foot, even other national brands, and I just became content wearing my sneakers without socks. They ALWAYS slid down into my show & I ended up walking on a wad of sock until I could fix it...or usually just took them off after a couple of tries. Enter Under Armor!!! They a mid weight, but not very thick & still breathable. They work too by actually staying on your foot! Not once have they slid down into my show!! Very comfortable but they could be a little more affordable.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on August 1, 2025

Verified Purchase

Rebekah

Louisville, US

★★★★★ 5

Love!

Size: Large, Color: (100) White / White / Mod Gray

Ive tried so many no show socks but I love these. This is the 3rd set I've bought. They never slip off and the material is thin and breathable. Perfect for working out.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on March 2, 2026

Verified Purchase

Becky

San Leandro, US

★★★★★ 5

True no-show socks that don’t slide down!

Size: Medium, Color: (100) White / White / Mod Gray, Size: Medium, Color: (100) White / White / Mod Gray

This is the first pair of no-show socks I’ve tried that actually don’t slide down into my shoes. Trust me… I have tried lots of different pairs and this is the one! They fit perfectly. They’re not too thick and they’re obviously durable because I wash them after each wear, so daily.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on March 21, 2026

Verified Purchase

Raquel Hall

Lexington, US

★★★★★ 4

Great fit but expensive

Size: Medium, Color: (252) Blush Beige / White / Castlerock

These are really great socks. I love them, but they are definitely pricey.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on March 30, 2026

Verified Purchase

LacyConner

Fort Morgan, US

★★★★★ 5

Great socks!

Size: Medium, Color: (252) Blush Beige / White / Castlerock

Love these socks so much I got a second package. I like how thin and airy they are and they never slide down my heel. For thin socks they’re pretty durable.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on August 16, 2025