


Audemars Piguet Royal Oak "Jumbo" 39mm Extra-Thin White Gold Grainy Blue Dial - 16202BC.OO.1240BC.02
Marsoni
M251S
Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping.
Friday, May 29
Audemars Piguet Royal Oak "Jumbo" 39mm Extra-Thin White Gold Grainy Blue Dial - 16202BC.OO.1240BC.02Brand Audemars Piguet Series Royal Oak Model Number 16202BC. OO. 1240BC. 02 Model Year Call for Enquiry Production Year Call for Enquiry Condition Call for Enquiry Box Papers Box & Papers Case Material White Gold Case Size 39 mm Case Shape Octagonal Case Back Transparent Case Details 18 carat white gold case, glareproofed sapphire crystal and caseback. Crown Screw Down Caliber Calibre 4302 Movement Automatic Hands Luminous Dial Color Blue Dial Type
Quick Dispatch:
Your Audemars Piguet Royal Oak "Jumbo" 39mm Extra-Thin White Gold Grainy Blue Dial - 16202BC.OO.1240BC.02 orders ship within 1-2 business days.
Delivery Options:
- Standard: 3-7 business days
- Fast: 2-3 business days
- Express: 1-2 business days
Order Tracking:
You'll receive a tracking link by email once your Audemars Piguet Royal Oak "Jumbo" 39mm Extra-Thin White Gold Grainy Blue Dial - 16202BC.OO.1240BC.02 ships.
Need Help?
Questions about Audemars Piguet Royal Oak "Jumbo" 39mm Extra-Thin White Gold Grainy Blue Dial - 16202BC.OO.1240BC.02, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.
Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for Audemars Piguet Royal Oak "Jumbo" 39mm Extra-Thin White Gold Grainy Blue Dial - 16202BC.OO.1240BC.02 in your area.
Get Shipping Estimates
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
You may also like
4.8 ★★★★★
Based on 859 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Good quality
Size: Medium, Color: Navy
I gave this as a Christmas present and he loved it. I was worried when I ordered it that the quality might not be that good, but I worried for nothing.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 18, 2026
★★★★★ 3
This is more like a long cardigan sweater, than a coat.
Size: Small, Color: #2 Blackandwhite
This is more like a long cardigan sweater, than a coat. It doesn't have much structure & the pocket placement is too high for a coat. That being said, it's very soft & comfortable. As far as sizing goes, the sleeves run a bit long, but the coat, itself, runs a bit tight. I'm 5'10'' and a small fit me, but I wouldn't be able wear anything very thick under it & I'm thin. It's light & machine washable. I almost kept it to wear as a long sweater, but it looks like a coat ,so I sent it back. If you're very thin with long arms and don't mind the pockets being a bit high, then this could be a very stylish piece for you. Otherwise, I would pass.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 17, 2026
★★★★★ 5
i would definitely recommend. stick with your regular size or size up for a less slim fit
Size: Small, Color: Black
I usually wear a medium, I ordered a small based on reading the reviews. I am 150lbs 5’4”. this coat fits great for me personally. it’s not bulky, it’s not baggy. it is a slim fit jacket, definitely more on the slender side. when i raise my arms above my head , the sleeves do come up a bit. I would suggest sticking to your normal size or if you want a less slim fit with a tiny bit more room, sizing up wouldn’t be an issue. the coat is super soft and has some weight to it. i would recommend this jacket, it is warm and a nice piece for formal attire.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 18, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Nice jacket
Size: Medium, Color: Grey 01
Nice jacket . Material exactly as described.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 3, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Value for money
Size: Large, Color: A-red
Exquisite; stylish.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 14, 2025