


Koni Heavy Track (Red) Shock 02-12 Jeep Liberty - Rear
Marsoni
M251S
Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping.
Friday, May 29
Koni Heavy Track (Red) Shock 02-12 Jeep Liberty - RearKONI Heavy Track 8240 series, red painted, internally adjustable twin tube low pressure gas charged shock absorber. This Part Fits: Year Make Model Submodel 2001 Jeep Cherokee Classic 2001 Jeep Cherokee Limited 2001 Jeep Cherokee SE 2001 Jeep Cherokee Sport 2006 Jeep Liberty 65th Anniversary Edition 2012 Jeep Liberty Jet 2002 2012 Jeep Liberty Limited 2002 2006,2010 2011 Jeep Liberty Renegade 2005 Jeep Liberty Rocky Mountain Edition 2002 2012 Jeep
Quick Dispatch:
Your Koni Heavy Track (Red) Shock 02-12 Jeep Liberty - Rear orders ship within 1-2 business days.
Delivery Options:
- Standard: 3-7 business days
- Fast: 2-3 business days
- Express: 1-2 business days
Order Tracking:
You'll receive a tracking link by email once your Koni Heavy Track (Red) Shock 02-12 Jeep Liberty - Rear ships.
Need Help?
Questions about Koni Heavy Track (Red) Shock 02-12 Jeep Liberty - Rear, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.
Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for Koni Heavy Track (Red) Shock 02-12 Jeep Liberty - Rear in your area.
Get Shipping Estimates
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
You may also like
4.2 ★★★★★
Based on 1764 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 4
A little snug on the thighs
Size: Medium, Color: Multicoloured G (5-pack)
Super comfy, soft and thin. For reference, I'm 5'6", 135, athletic build. I bought medium. I almost returned them because I thought they were a bit too snug on my thighs, and my thighs are not large at all. I was concerned about panty lines under snug clothing. But, because they're thin, I figured they would probably stretch, so I kept them. So far, I've only worn them under a night shirt, but they're super comfortable and they dont ride up at all. Very nice, but if your thighs are a little thick, you probably won't like them.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 29, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Functional + Sexy
Size: Small, Color: Multicoloured E-(5-pack), Size: Small, Color: Multicoloured E-(5-pack)
Not only do these feel good, my husband can’t keep his hands off me. They fit so good and are soft. I change into these to sleep but also just use them as shorts to wear around the house. They’re comfortable and don’t slide around. I got a size small and I’m 100lbs.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 13, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Finally!
Size: X-Large, Color: All Black D (5-pack)
Finally, comfortable underwear that don’t end up giving me a wedgie. I have a round booty and most cuts of underwear end up shifting as I walk and sit. The hem of the underwear comes right under my cheeks and the lightweight material ensures there’s no panty line and no shifting to where I don’t want them! I’m definitely purchasing more.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 17, 2026
★★★★★ 3
Ehh
Size: Medium, Color: Multicoloured E-(5-pack)
Very thin, still comfy but very thin material. Super soft though. I've worn and washed and they have held up but I won't be repurchasing bc these are so thin
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 14, 2026
★★★★★ 5
They’re fantastic!!!!
Size: X-Large, Color: Multicoloured E-(5-pack)
My clothing size is 16/18 and XL. Even though Amazon suggested a size XXL, I ordered my normal XL and they fit perfectly.
The fabric for this style is 92% bamboo viscose and is amazingly soft and almost silky feeling. I had ordered a different boy short in this brand but they were 80% bamboo viscose and the fabric was significantly heavier. I returned those and ordered these.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 25, 2026